SpectraliaSpectralia
Technical Architecture

The science behind the Orchestrator

Isolated Zero-Trust agents, Reinforcement Learning orchestration, LLM intent translation — dive into Spectralia's technological foundations.

FFT & WaveletsPPO / RLHFZero-Trust AgentsLLM Function CallingDynamic Dashboards
< 200ms
Analysis latency per signal
Multi-layer
Frequency decomposition
0
Cross-visibility between agents
Possible orchestration sequences

The 4 Pillars

An architecture designed as an intelligent ecosystem

Four complementary building blocks that form a system capable of listening, learning, and adapting continuously.

Signal Processing

Spectral Analysis

FFT / Wavelet / Isolation Forest

To understand the approach, imagine a sound engineer analyzing an audio track: they don't read samples one by one, they perceive frequencies, harmonics, dissonances. Spectralia applies this same logic to your operational data. Instead of browsing thousands of log lines, the Orchestrator decomposes signals into recurring patterns, slow trends, and emerging anomalies — long before a classic alert triggers.

  • Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and wavelet decomposition applied to system metrics
  • Isolation Forest for anomaly detection in high-dimensional data spaces
  • Cross-spectral correlation between distributed components to identify weak signals
  • Intelligent background noise filtering to focus attention on real signals
  • Early detection of coordinated patterns between multiple sources before escalation
numpy / scipy / wavelet transforms
signal processing.module
$ spectral_analysis --mode=realtime
Tendances lentes
normal
Motifs récurrents
normal
Signaux rares
attention
Anomalies
alerte
Motif coordonné détecté : 3 composants corrélés à 94.7%
Dual Architecture

Macro / Micro Brain

Zero-Trust applied to AI

The architecture is deliberately split into two hermetic worlds. The Macro — slow brain — analyzes history over months, compares entire regions, detects diffuse systemic drifts. Micro agents — ultra-specialized, ultra-isolated — each monitor a tiny perimeter without visibility into the rest. We deliberately sacrifice horizontal cooperation for absolute isolation.

  • Macro: historical storage (TimescaleDB) + multi-region comparison over several months
  • Micro: Docker/Kubernetes sandbox with strict permissions per agent
  • Absolute isolation between agents — no horizontal communication possible
  • Zero-Trust Architecture: each agent is blind to the rest of the system
  • Maximum watertightness for uncompromising data security
Kubernetes / TimescaleDB / Prometheus
dual architecture.module
$ architecture --view=topology
MACRO
Cerveau lent
Historique 180 jours
12 To analysés
Auth MFA
Isolé — scope unique
Bucket S3
Isolé — scope unique
Queue SQS
Isolé — scope unique
0 communication horizontale — isolation absolue
Reinforcement Learning

Adaptive Puppeteer

PPO + RLHF + Imitation Learning

At the center of everything, the Puppeteer. No fixed rules: it learns by reinforcement the best sequence of agents to activate according to context. Which agent to wake up? In what order? Should we use Macro or stay in Micro? Strict hierarchical or federated mode? It continuously optimizes its 'choreographies' for ever faster and more cost-effective results.

  • PPO (Proximal Policy Optimization) with reduced state space via spectral analysis
  • RLHF + imitation learning pre-trained on thousands of historical incidents
  • Composite rewards: resolution speed + calculation cost + accuracy + security
  • Hybrid mode at startup: RL assisted by human expert rules
  • Supervision mode: an operator can validate and anchor optimal sequences
PPO / RLHF / LangGraph / CrewAI
reinforcement learning.module
$ puppeteer --episode=2847 --mode=rl
1Wake agent_auth_mfa+0.3done
2Query macro_90d_compare+0.5done
3Cross-check deploy_metrics+0.8done
4Skip agent_network (low signal)+0.2optimized
Score épisode+1.8 / 2.0
LLM Integration

Intent Translator

From natural language to agents

The LLM doesn't just generate text blindly. It translates your intentions into sequences of concrete actions: it understands what you really want, breaks down your request into logical sub-tasks, orchestrates agents via the Puppeteer, retrieves raw results, and generates a living dashboard — adapted exactly to your current question.

  • Multi-level intent parsing: from vague question to precise action
  • Automatic decomposition into logical sequence of agent calls
  • Orchestration via the Puppeteer: 'activate Micro agent X, then ask Macro Y'
  • Intelligent recomposition of raw results into a coherent response
  • Generation of dynamic dashboards adapted to the context of the question
Fine-tuned LLM / Function calling / RAG
llm integration.module
$ llm --intent-parse --generate-dashboard
"Pourquoi 12% d'erreur 500 en Europe du Nord depuis mardi ? Lié à la nouvelle BDD ?"
→ Intent: root_cause_analysis + correlation
→ Agents: [micro_eu_north, macro_90d, micro_db_deploy]
→ Sequence: parallel(micro) → macro → cross_check
→ Output: dashboard_custom_4widgets
Corrélation
94.2%
Cause racine
DB v3.2

Tech Stack

Built on solid foundations

Signal Processing
FFT, Wavelet, scipy
Machine Learning
PPO, Isolation Forest, RLHF
Zero-Trust Agents
Docker, K8s, sandbox
Infrastructure
Prometheus, TimescaleDB
Data Layer
SAP, ERP, SQL Connectors
LLM Engine
Function calling, RAG
Orchestration
LangGraph, CrewAI
Dynamic UI
On-the-fly generated dashboards

Want to dig deeper into the tech?

Let's discuss architecture and use cases. Our engineering team is here to answer your technical questions.